A few weeks ago, I scoured the internet for articles about life insurance, and the stuff I found was horrifying. Virtually every country in the world is plagued by scandals. Regulation is universally inadequate, non-existent, or unenforced. Whole life, universal life, and unit-linked policies are everywhere condemned as ripoffs, and the people who flog these products are widely regarded as the scum of the Earth.
I saved links to many of the articles and excerpted the most illuminating quotes. All of this info has been organized below, categorized by country.
The bulk of the articles are from the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and India. There are also articles from Japan, Korea, Singapore, New Zealand, UAE, Ireland, Germany, and Switzerland. I have excluded articles from Hong Kong, as there are already an abundance of articles on the “News” section of this website.
I could have kept reading and collecting more articles from more countries, but I saw no point. A Google search for the phrase, “life insurance scandal“, retrieves 75,100 results—more than anyone could hope to read, especially since the number of scandals is growing daily. Also note that these 75,100 search results only reflect articles written in English (not Chinese, Spanish, and other languages).
I encourage regulators/legislators to browse through the articles below to gain a sense of the magnitude of the devastation that life insurers have brought upon families all over the world.
It is overwhelmingly clear that the root of every country’s problem is a product distribution model greased by excessive, secret commissions and other high charges which are deliberately hidden by opaque, deceptive policy structures.
In order to stop insurers from systematically exploiting consumers, regulators must rein in (if not ban) commissions and require total transparency in pricing. If insurers are unable to sell their products without bribing brokers and deceiving consumers, then their products don’t deserve to exist. Good products, such as low-cost index funds and term life insurance, sell themselves.
“The purposes of this paper are to describe a variety of deceptive sales practices used in the life insurance business and to suggest ways in which such practices might be modified so as to eliminate the element of deception. All of the practices discussed in the paper involve numbers, and also utilize improper statements about either the price of life insurance protection or the rate of return on the savings element of a cash-value life insurance contract. The conclusion is that the widespread use of such practices constitutes a national scandal, and that the entire subject should be examined carefully by those interested in the welfare of the life insurance business.”
“But such whole-life solicitations are at the heart of the widening scandal hitting Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. and other big insurers. At least 13 states are investigating allegedly misleading sales practices by MetLife agents, mainly for national mailings made from its Tampa office. MetLife says it is cooperating.
Now, the scrutiny is spreading. Misleading sales literature for whole-life insurance policies, allegedly used by agents of New York Life Insurance Co. and Prudential Insurance Co. of America, has surfaced in state insurance-department offices. A New York Life spokesman says the company is cooperating with an investigation by the Florida Insurance Dept. and has hired a law firm to investigate. He says he is unaware of a New York inquiry. A Prudential spokesman says it has received an inquiry from New York about an agent’s sales letter and has pulled the unauthorized letter. “We don’t expect to have the same type of problem that we’ve read about,” he says.
Few regulators believe the scandal will stop there, however. “There’s no doubt in my mind that the scope of this is broader than just MetLife and some other companies mentioned,” says Salvatore R. Curiale, New York’s superintendent of insurance. “I think market conduct and misleading sales practices will be the major issue for life companies in 1994.” Curiale is mailing a sternly worded letter to 147 life-insurance companies urging them to beef up internal controls of sales personnel. Adds Florida insurance commissioner Tom Gallagher: The investigations are “putting pressure on the industry to clean up its act.”
At the heart of the scandal are whole-life insurance policies–long sold as products consumers can use to fund retirement, which, indeed, they can. The problem is that with competition for consumer dollars becoming more intense, insurers’ sales tactics have become increasingly aggressive.”
“Back in the old days, insurance companies sold you insurance.
You paid them a premium. They paid you on your claims. Simple.
But some people in the industry came to the conclusion that just selling insurance wasn’t good enough. Mutual funds were growing like gangbusters. Savings and loans were hot on the tail of American savers. Even conservative banks were spreading their wings. Insurance executives figured they wanted a piece of the revenues too.
“Instead of just selling insurance policies, we can sell investment programs with a veneer of insurance,” they reasoned. “Instead of just watching money come in one door (as premiums) and go out the other door (as claims payments), we can actually hold onto people’s money — like a bank or mutual fund,” they figured.
They wanted to expand beyond the boring business of selling insurance to the exciting business of selling investments.”
“Prudential — the Rock-of-Gibraltar-largest-insurance-company-in-the-world Prudential — came up with another very “creative” solution. They figured out a way to disguise the life insurance as an annuity, set up a big sales force trained to obfuscate the real nature of the product and sell it to millions of investors. All annuity policies sold by insurance companies do have a small life insurance component. But that’s a far cry from being an actual life insurance policy.”
“It’s hard to find out how much a product really costs. It’s hard to figure out how much you’re paying in commissions. It’s hard to know what the true yield will be. And unless it’s term insurance, it’s impractical to compare the products of all competing insurers side by side.
People in the insurance industry who have lived with this problem all their lives don’t pay much attention to it. But anyone who compares insurance to mutual funds or ETFs is appalled. “Can’t you tell me what your 1-year yield is? Can’t you tell me what your expense ratio is? Can’t I compare your policy with a hundred other policies?”
The answers: No. No. No. You can’t do anything even close.
How does the insurance industry get away with this secrecy? By always maintaining that thin veneer of insurance on their investment products.”
“If you’re shopping for a mutual fund, you will get a prospectus that discloses all the risks. If you’re shopping for a cash-value life insurance policy, you get a policy illustration that often promises much but discloses little.
What about the actual insurance contract itself — the actual product you’re buying? You don’t get to see that until after the underwriting process is complete. You’d have to go through this same process with several companies before you could make a comparison. Shopping around becomes so impractical as to be virtually impossible.”
“Typically, [the policy illustration] tells you little about the allocation of your funds or the breakdown of fees. It discloses nothing about the risk or the financial stability of the insurer. It tells you nothing about the commissions your broker will make.
Rather, its primary purpose is to give you scenarios of future performance based on assumptions about inflation and interest rates. Some companies use conservative assumptions. Some companies try to tweak the results to make the policies look better. And some go off the deep end, making assumptions that make their policies really shine.”
“You ask the agent what his commission is. His response: “Don’t worry about that, the company writes my commission check.” He doesn’t tell you that no matter who writes the physical check, the money comes out of your pocket.”
“Ready to buy life insurance? OK. Then you’d better get started learning all the jargon. Do you know what a “paid-up addition” is? How about a “mortality charge”? “Waive-of-premium rider”? If you don’t, you’re in good company. Most consumers who try to learn about life insurance are overwhelmed by the jargon. As a result, many simply bow to agents’ high-pressure tactics without knowing what they are buying or how much it costs.”
“One of the most underhanded aspects of the life insurance industry is that, in the third millennium, you are not likely to encounter anyone who introduces himself as a life insurance salesman. Instead, you will encounter “pension consultants,” “financial advisors,” and “financial planners.” Heck, even stockbrokers and bank tellers are selling life insurance when they can.”
“In this environment, the ethical agents have a hard time making a better-than-average living, while the sharks have a field day.”
“But somewhere in the middle, there are also well-meaning people who were sold a bill of goods while they were being trained in insurance products. They have been conditioned by the industry, they think they know what they are talking about, they tell you what you want to know (according to what they have been told) and they are most likely not out to cheat you! But you get cheated anyway because your well-meaning agent is in the same position you are in: He believed what the “experts” told him.”
“Life insurance scandals continue to ripple through American pocketbooks. The landscape feels like the Wild West. Too many outlaws, not enough sheriffs.
The latest headline-grabber originated at giant Metropolitan Life. MetLife agents based in Tampa, Fla., gulled customers out of some $11 million, by selling them so-called “retirement plans” that were cash-value life-insurance policies in disguise. Buyers thought that their monthly payments were pure investments; in fact, they were life-insurance premiums.”
“Before closing this particular chapter, MetLife may offer refunds to nearly 65,000 clients. The company has paid fines in Georgia and Massachusetts and other forfeits may follow. But all that’s unique about MetLife is that (1) the promotion was so widespread and (2) it got caught. For several years now, many companies and agents have been touting insurance as a “private pension” or a “retirement savings plan” — superior, they claim, even to tax-favored Individual Retirement Accounts, Keoghs or 401(k)s.”
“Firing a handful of agents jibes with the industry’s usual defense: that sales deceptions are practiced by just a few “bad apples.” But MetLife management was warned by the Texas insurance commission back in 1990 to quit selling misleading retirement plans.
Will MetLife’s troubles inspire a cleanup in the rest of the industry, shot through as it is with deceptive sales techniques? Not very likely, despite years of persistence by insurance-industry reformers. They’re trying to teach a pig to sing, which wastes the breath and annoys the pig. It’s time for better regulation to step in.”
“VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE SCAM
You might wonder why lawyers who represent investors in disputes against stockbrokers would be writing about life insurance. Most people are unaware that certain life insurance products are actually securities and can only be sold by agents who hold a special type of broker’s license. In fact, we are seeing more and more cases of bad brokers turning to insurance products as a way to boost their sagging income. People often don’t realize that an insurance agent can be sued for sales abuses. But in fact, such agents are held to many of the standards applicable to conventional stockbrokers.
The prevalence of insurance products that function like securities has turned the process of dealing with life insurance agents into something akin to a walk in a minefield. Buying life insurance used to just be stressful and confusing. But these days, it actually can threaten your financial health. Insurance companies and their agents rarely tell the whole truth when selling policies. They might represent life insurance to be a retirement plan, or promise customers that premiums eventually will vanish thanks to the policy’s investment returns. They might engage in unfair comparisons in order to have policyholders needlessly cash in current policies to buy new policies, a sales abuse called “twisting” or “churning.” Or they might sell a policy they know or should know will be a money pit — a policy that will lapse in the near future as premiums unexpectedly increase.
At Hermann, Cahn & Schneider, our attorneys handle cases related to each of these different types of insurance sales practices”
“Don’t insurance companies care if their products fail?
Logically, one would ask why insurance companies and their agents, knowing that so many of these policies are doomed to fail, would continue to sell VULs. One would also ask why these companies and their agents don’t disclose the problems to buyers at the time of sale. The answer is simple. Commissions and fees earned on a variable universal life policy, especially in the first year of the policy’s existence, typically are enormous. The profit motive overrides all other considerations for insurers and many insurance agents.”
“In the last 5 years, experts (including myself) have identified well over 23 million potential victims of Life Insurance Fraud in the United States.”
“Somebody mark my words, “Variable Insurance Fraud is the very next time bomb waiting to go off.” Within the last two years I have had intelligent policyowners tell me, “My agent told me that our money is somehow tied into the Stock Market and if nothing changes for the next 30 years, we’ll be millionaires.” Does anyone realize how hard it is to respond to a statement like that with a straight face? When is the very last time the Stock Market remained unchanged for 30 minutes – much less 30 years?”
“Navigating replacement waters means swimming with the sharks. It’s notoriously difficult for nonprofessionals to analyze and compare policies. And considering the recent churning allegations against Metropolitan Life, Prudential, and other insurance companies, it’s hard to know who to trust for advice. “Some of the things being done are blatant thievery. Clients need to become educated,” says Richard Sabo, a former MetLife agent in Pennsylvania whose 1993 whistleblower complaints on churning and related fraud led to a state investigation, resulting in a $1.5 million fine plus restoration of old policies.”
“In reality, you only need life insurance for as long as your premature death represents a financial strain to your family. If you are out of debt and have built your savings, then why do you need to continue to pay for any type of policy? By getting rid of debt and maximizing other investment opportunities, the need for life insurance for your “whole life” is eliminated.”
“Many will point out that term life policies pay fewer claims since they can expire while the insured is still alive. This is true . . . but does it matter if you don’t need the coverage any longer? Why is life insurance any different than home or auto coverage’s that only pay if there is a claim?”
“When cash value agents use mathematical data to prove their point, they often overlook other key issues. They never seem to take into account the cost of your continuing debt while saving in their plan. In addition, access to your savings requires a loan and interest paid to the insurance company or a withdrawal which reduces the policy amount if not repaid. They also overlook that only the policy death benefit is paid to the beneficiary . . . not the savings.”
“Term insurance often prevails, in theory. Both Daily and Steck believe term insurance is the best option for most consumers. Daily considers it the “default option” and says he “has to be convinced” that cash value insurance is a better one.”
“Agents may try to sell you a cash-value policy as a way to invest for retirement. They’ll tell you that the investing component serves as “forced savings.” (Sure, but retirement plans like 401(k)s force you to save too, once you’ve taken the initiative to sign up for them.) They’ll say the money you have building up in your cash-value policy can grow tax-deferred, but money in IRAs and 401(k)s does too. What they won’t tell you is that cash-value insurance is generally a poor investment.
It is a very costly way to invest. There’s the cost of the insurance protection itself – which, by the way, is usually more expensive than what you would pay for a regular term insurance policy. There are the marketing and sales commissions. There’s also the “surrender charge” that may be levied if you decide to drop your policy within the first 10 years or so. The amount of a surrender charge varies by insurer and type of policy, but it is not uncommon for it to exceed the total amount of your first-year premium.
And, on top of all that, there are annual investment fees. Those are not broken out in all policies, so it’s often hard to determine how much you’re paying.
The heavy fees involved with cash-value life insurance can really drag down your returns. Especially when you consider that index mutual funds often have annual expenses under 0.5%, and many actively managed mutual funds charge 1% or so. That’s a lot less than the 3% or more you’ll pay for the investment component on a cash-value policy.
The lesson: If you need life insurance, get term insurance.”
“Here’s how I bought life insurance without getting screwed:
1. Get Term Life Insurance
I’m about to save you billions of brain cells and thousands of dollars. Just buy term life insurance. The only exception is if you are an extremely high net worth individual, in which case you “have people” to discuss your privileged a$$ed-options and don’t need my blog anyways. Smile.”
“If you’re in the 50-plus age range, don’t listen to someone who tells you that whole life is your only option.”
“Seniors are inundated with a never-ending onslaught of insurance offers. Disability insurance, Medigap, supplemental, mortgage life, self-funded healthcare, long-term insurance, permanent life, term life…and the list goes on.
Salesmen use many questionable tactics to get seniors, who are often times too trusting and too easily fooled, to buy insurance policies they don’t need. For example, the pitch may offer a very low-cost first month premium, but the small type grants the insurer the right to charge your parent’s credit card at a greatly inflated rate every month.”
“Opinions on whole life insurance get fiery. Advisors who sell it tend to be older. Whole life was probably the first product they sold. They’ve learned how to position it and deal with objections. They’ve convinced themselves of the merits. Criticize whole life and you’re in for an argument.
Over the years, advisors have said that whole life pays higher compensation than any other life insurance product. Let’s ignore that. Let’s get to the core question: why do you buy insurance? To transfer risk to the insurer.
Whole life transfers risk back to you. Is that what you want?”
“But potential buyers of whole-life insurance should be aware of its downsides. Because it isn’t a transparent product, it’s difficult to assess what its actual returns are. Part of the policy’s returns may also include a partial return of premiums paid. In other words, you may be getting some of your own money back.”
“A whole-life policy can bind the owner to the fate of a single company for decades, with steep costs to get out early. Some insurers now struggling looked very strong as recently as two years ago.”
“Additionally, whole-life policies often must be held for 20 years to realize any actual gains because of stiff charges loaded in the early years of the policy — including commissions and administrative fees. Yet 44% of whole-life policies lapse in the first 10 years, according to Limra, the insurance industry research group — which means that policies terminate after people stop paying premiums.”
“While insurance agents are quick to tout permanent life’s virtues—in part because it carries high commissions—the factors driving the decision of which insurance to buy haven’t changed because of the financial crisis. For most people, term life still offers the best combination of coverage and cost. But for some wealthier folks looking to build tax-deferred savings, permanent life can be a good option.”
“In short, term life remains the best choice for most people, says James Hunt, an actuary with the Consumer Federation of America, a nonprofit advocacy group based in Washington. It is the lowest-cost way to get the most coverage for a shorter period, and it is easy to walk away from a policy if you find a better deal or your needs change, he says.
Permanent-life policies, in contrast, generally need to be held for at least two decades for the savings component to beat a bond-based buy-term-and-invest-the-difference strategy. That’s because the savings account expands so slowly in many of the policies pitched to consumers—thanks largely to big upfront commissions.
Many buyers underestimate how difficult it can be to keep up with the high premiums, and end up walking away from a policy early. According to the Society of Actuaries, which studied data from the early 2000s, 26% of whole-life policies are terminated in the first three policy years and 45% in the first 10 years.”
Buying Permanent Life
“Permanent-life policies vary widely across the industry and are hugely difficult for ordinary consumers to understand, much less compare.”
“The insurance regulator of New York has reportedly commenced investigation on the sales of indexed universal life insurance products in the US.
A letter that was reviewed by Reuters reported that nearly 134 insurers were issued a document by New York financial services department superintendent Benjamin Lawsky earlier this month.
The insurers were asked to provide details about the marketing of life insurance policies connected to stock market indices, such as the S&P 500.
A person familiar with the matter said that regulatory officials were ‘seriously concerned’ that the illustrations were ‘wildly inaccurate’, and could have a serious impact on the clients.”
“I hate writing about cash-value life insurance. Sure, financial planners are a little touchy. Yes, brokers occasionally go postal. But insurance agents take the prize, forever filling my in-box with angry e-mails.
Still, like a masochist in search of his next fix, I feel compelled to write about these policies. The fact is, cash-value life insurance is a huge business, with individuals forking over more than $90 billion in annual premiums, according to the American Council of Life Insurers in Washington.
Thinking of purchasing one of these products? Here’s a buyer’s guide to cash-value life insurance.
Should I buy? My initial reaction: Don’t. Instead, get low-cost financial protection for your family by purchasing term insurance, which offers a death benefit and nothing more.
In fact, if you want a little fun next time you see your insurance agent, just mutter, “Buy term and invest the difference.” Most agents loathe this strategy.
Instead, they will push you to buy cash-value life insurance, which combines the pure insurance of a term policy with a tax-favored investment account. That will mean a fat commission for them — and much bigger premium payments for you.”
“life-insurance agents’ mainstay product, known as whole life, suffered a black eye, both from a scandal over the way some agents sold it and from a widespread view that it wasn’t a very good investment.”
“Seventy percent of agents earn less than $35,000 in their second year, according to industry research firm Limra. Fewer than 20% of new agents are still on the job after four years.”
“Whole life, given its complexity, generally isn’t sold via the Internet, but needs an agent to explain it.”
“Though most new agents have potential customers among their friends, family and former work colleagues, to have a sustainable career, the agents must reach the point where those people refer their own friends. Some rookies never do.”
“Catherine Calise, 48, joined New York Life last June after the housing slump brought an end to her 18-year career as a real-estate agent in Connecticut.
She regularly hauls a card table to the loading dock of a freight company to greet workers with brochures. She fills her calendar with Chamber of Commerce and other networking events. She treks through shopping strips to meet storekeepers. She has even gone house to house knocking on doors.
“You have to step a little out of your comfort zone,” she says. “I’ll be in line at the grocery store, picking up dry cleaning, grabbing an iced tea at Starbucks, and I’ll be prospecting the person next to me” by striking up a chat.
Ms. Calise won the “rookie of the year” sales award for 2009 for her Southern Connecticut office, where some of the 22 hires she began with have quit. “Those who dropped out weren’t really applying themselves to the fullest,” she says. “They didn’t have the passion or the desire.””
“agents make much more money selling a whole-life policy than they do selling a term policy.
It’s no wonder, then, that agents push whole-life policies as if their livelihoods depend on it, because, well, they do. If whole-life policies were beneficial to consumers, our story would end here. The fact is the vast majority of those who need insurance should buy term.”
“Many insurance brokers push whole life policies because they provide them with the juiciest of commissions…But the vast majority of Americans would benefit more from term life policies.
So, if whole life insurance has inherent value and is more an investment than an insurance plan, why don’t more people buy it? Probably because life insurance is often a poor investment. While it produces a low but steady annual return, other types of long-term investments often outmatch the gains you can earn from it.”
“This analysis shows you why whole life insurance doesn’t generally make sense as an investment product, especially for families in Silicon Valley. Brokers and advisors who are paid high commissions on whole life insurance policies try to take advantage of your desire to protect your family in order to sell you whole life insurance. But, you don’t have to fall for their pitch.”
“Sadly, over 70% of the life insurance policies sold today are cash value policies. A cash value policy is an insurance product that packages insurance and savings together. Do not invest money in life insurance; the returns are horrible. Your insurance person will show you wonderful projections, but none of these policies perform as projected.”
“Worse yet, with whole life and universal life, the savings you finally build up after being ripped off for years don’t go to your family upon your death. The only benefit paid to your family is the face value of the policy”.
“The policies can make sense for people who need insurance and have maxed out contributions to 401(k)s and other tax-advantaged plans, advisers say. But many buyers underestimate how difficult it can be to pay the premiums year after year, and they end up canceling their policy before they break even.
In a study released in December, the Society of Actuaries found that 20% of whole-life policies are terminated in the first three years, and 39% within the first 10 years.
Early dropouts would have been much better off in cheaper term-life insurance, advisers say. “One needs to keep a cash-value policy at least 20 years to amortize the acquisition costs and produce a decent investment,” says James Hunt, an actuary at the Consumer Federation of America, an advocacy group.”
“And there isn’t an easy way to compare these costs across companies. “Cash-value policies are impossible for laypersons to penetrate,” Mr. Hunt says.”
“To find a reasonably priced policy, you could hire a fee-only life-insurance adviser, or use the policy evaluation service offered by the Consumer Federation of America at www.evaluatelifeinsurance.org. It typically costs $90 for the first analysis and $65 for each additional one.”
“Reason #3: Positive returns take a long time to appear
In the rosy illustrations, beyond the guaranteed portion mentioned above, a policy that’s held for 40 years or so will show a return of around 4%. That’s not bad, although 10-year Treasury Bonds have historically returned 5.4%. The problem is that it takes a long time for the returns to reach that level. There will be many years at the start of the policy where your return will be negative, and many more years where the return will be only slightly positive. If you stick with it for a long time, you eventually get into a reasonable range of returns, but if at any point before that you decide you want to do something different, you will have spent many years and a lot of money getting very poor returns.
Keep in mind that this is very different from the possibility of poor returns from stocks and bonds. While stocks and bonds guarantee nothing and certainly might show poor performance over certain periods, whole life is almost guaranteed to have very poor performance for at least a decade and often upwards of two decades.
This is not the possibility of bad returns. It is the promise of it.”
“Reason #7: Lack of transparency in fees. Complicated terms and conditions.
Whole life policies include many fees that are never laid out for you. There is the commission to the salesman. There are administrative costs. There is the cost of the insurance. I challenge you to find an example of a whole life illustration that lays out these costs for you, similar to the way a mutual fund has to tell you the expense ratio, sales commissions, and other fees. They just aren’t transparent, which makes it impossible to understand what you’re truly paying for. And these costs can change over time, again without you knowing, and those changes can affect the return you receive.
There are many other terms and conditions that make these policies very complicated. One such example is the issue described above where borrowing too much from your policy can cause it to lapse. Another is the “guaranteed” interest rate that’s actually much lower than what they state. Even the salesmen selling them often don’t understand how it all works. One salesman, after I asked a number of questions he didn’t know the answer to, compared it to buying a watch. He showed me his watch and said that he didn’t know how it worked, he just knew that it worked. Whole life, he said, was the same way. Needless to say, I did not give him any business.”
“Many times the whole life policy costs you as much as 10 times more than term life. As bad as that sounds, it gets worse. Because it’s so expensive, people buy a lot less insurance than they need so their family goes unprotected. That is the worst part of this story and it’s something I’m committed to correct.
So why do life insurance agents sell permanent life insurance?
I think you already know the answer to this question. Money. Insurance agents get a huge commission when they sell you whole life or universal life insurance. And they collect significantly less when you buy term life insurance. Insurance companies make big bucks on whole life insurance and they indoctrinate their agents to sell it. Some agents might actually believe it’s a good deal. They point to the forced savings element and the guarantees as proof but they are misguided”
“What is the truth about whole life insurance?
Ok, so now that we have explained the features of whole life insurance, and in a very undeserving and flattering way, we will also tell you some other features that the insurance salesman might not tell you. Did you know that with a whole life insurance policy, upon death the beneficiaries are paid the death benefit, but the “cash value” which is considered an “investment” is actually kept by the insurance company? That’s right! The insurance company keeps your “investment”, “retirement fund”, or whatever else the insurance company and salesman might advertise it as. What the “cash value” account actually is, is an account that the insurance company builds up to cover the death benefit that they will be required to pay when the insured individual dies. It really isn’t an investment at all but simply a way for the insurance company to get you to pay for your own death benefit. Really? Does this sound like a rip-off? It does; and that is because whole life insurance is a rip-off. Why do you think you don’t have to continue making premium payments once it reaches the value of the death benefit? Because the insurance companies have already made huge profits through fees and investing your “cash value” account for a much higher return than what they are paying you. When the “cash value” account equals the death benefit the insurance company has eliminated every little bit of risk that the policy held.
Another feature of the “cash value” is that for the first 3 years, the portion of the premium payments that are supposed to be deposited into the “cash value” account, are not being deposited at all. For the first three years this money is going directly into the pocket of the insurance salesman that sold the policy. After three years of investing, your “cash value” account is worth NOTHING! You would be better off buying a term life insurance policy for a much smaller premium and investing the difference in a jar. Talk about peace of mind. At least you will know the insurance company isn’t dipping their slimy hands into that jar the way they are you “cash value” account.
Something else that whole life insurance salesmen don’t tell you is that the returns offered to the “cash value” account are horrible. In fact, the return that the “cash value” will earn probably won’t even beat inflation meaning that you may not even experience a “real return.” Salesmen will try and paint a pretty forecast of returns but they are never nearly as pretty as their optimistic forecast. Yes, there may be a guaranteed interest rate, but there is also a guarantee that the insurance company is investing your money for a higher return than what they are paying you. The insurance company is basically stealing a portion of your returns. Why not just buy term-life insurance and invest the difference in an investment where you get to keep ALL of the returns. Now, the insurance salesmen like to press the issue of forced savings but honestly, what is stopping you from not making the insurance premium payments? Is it really forced? If you were to go through financial difficult and fell behind on payments, and then unexpectedly died, the policy would be void and your loved ones wouldn’t see a dime of the death benefit that you had been paying for. Term life insurance policies are much cheaper so it is unlikely that you would experience financial difficulties severe enough to keep you from making premium payments. Also, there are simply much better ways of forced savings such as rental property, paying down a mortgage or having money taken out of your paycheck and deposited into a retirement fund such as a 401k, a Roth IRA or a Traditional IRA.
Insurance salesmen like to use doom and gloom forecast to scare people into purchasing a whole life insurance policy that offers a guaranteed return. But remember, the return that the insurance companies are guaranteeing is coming from investments that they have made in the very securities they are trying to scare you away from. Also, Bonds and Mutual Funds may be volatile in the short-term but isn’t retirement investing a long-term investment? If you were to invest your money into a mutual fund for 30 years there may be periods where you lose money, but unless the world ends, I am pretty sure in the long-run you will have a decent average annual return that is much higher than the measly return offered by the insurance company for your “cash value.”
Finally I will tackle the tax benefits of the “cash value”. Yes, there are benefits in deferring taxes, but you do have other options that offer you the same or even better tax benefits. You can open a traditional IRA, a Roth IRA, or a 401K plan which offers you equivalent or better tax benefits than the “cash value” of a whole life insurance policy. Click here to check out our video on these types of retirement accounts to learn the tax benefits.
The point that this article is clearly making is that whole life insurance and every other kind of permanent “cash value” life insurance policy is a rip-off and a scam. Insurance companies are in the business of making money and these kinds of policies are the most profitable for them, NOT YOU! This is the reason why just about every insurance salesman pushes these kinds of policies. They are the most profitable because they are the biggest rip-off. Life insurance is protection, not an investment, and they should always be handled separately.”
“How do life insurance companies make money? When I ask this question of my friends, I get a variety of interesting answers — aside from a bunch of odd looks. One mathematically inclined acquaintance said insurance companies use complex actuarial tables which enable them to predict, very accurately, how long people will live and the insurers figure that, over time, they will collect more money than they pay out. To this answer, I nod in slight agreement. The latter part is true but not because of any actuarial brilliance. Insurance companies make money because a massive amount of all life insurance coverage lapses. (Note: In an earlier version of this post, we published a statistic regarding lapse rates. We removed it at the request of the source.)
Most people pay into a term or whole life policy for years, sometimes hundreds of thousands of dollars, and then allow those same policies to lapse — and the insurance company never pays out a penny. Yes, if the insured passes away, then the company pays a death benefit, but this is a fairly rare occurrence due to the high lapse rates. Some sources suggest that less than two percent of term policies ever result in a death claim.”
“cash value policies only work out well when they are held for life. Once you’re in, it’s tough to get out without a little financial pain.
“The fundamental savings advantage of cash value insurance savings is tax-sheltered earnings. Most Americans, however, now have access to a wide variety of tax-sheltered savings plans, including employer-sponsored retirement plans, individual IRAs, education IRAs, and state-sponsored tuition savings plans. Moreover, the IRS has recently relaxed penalties on early withdrawals for things like first-time home purchases, educational expenses, and catastrophic medical bills.”
“Tax-efficient estate planning
This is not a big deal to most people. The federal exemption from estate taxes is closing in on $700,000 and, according to the current plan, will reach $1 million by 2005. Nonetheless, if you are planning to leave a multimillion-dollar cookie jar for your heirs (hello, my long-lost uncle!), and want Uncle Sam’s hands kept out of it, you may want to sit down with an estate planning specialist.
A specialist might recommend a cash value life insurance plan as a means of bypassing the tax man — we don’t know. In general, this is a very complicated topic and well beyond the scope of what we can easily cover here.”
“John [and his wife’s] options are still limited because the policies are designed to trap them…with high fees and various charges. John and his wife can:
Keep paying into the policies and get plucked by high fees (not good); or
Cancel the policies now and receive nothing back (not good); or
Stop paying premiums and let the policies wind down by themselves (not good)”
“I like what posterolemeph said on the Bogleheads forum:
> > “The only way you can benefit from this product is by dying fairly soon.”
“Of course this is where the crafty insurance agent who sells permanent life insurance will sometimes step in. He’ll try to convince you to buy universal life insurance for your kids as “the best investment you can make.” Do not fall for this, please. If someone starts talking about this to you, just tell them to shut up and show them out. Say nothing. Fake appendicitis if you have to. Just get rid of them. They are snake oil salesmen and nothing more.”
“Don’t saddle yourself with crappy insurance for kids. It’s a complete waste. If anyone tries to tell you otherwise, they are insulting your intelligence.”
“In a follow-up e-mail, Austin’s NACFA associate Brian Kay urged prospective members not to miss out on “this obscenely profitable niche.” And they aren’t the only insurance pros positively giddy about the potential of the college market.
Hyperbole abounds on the websites of groups soliciting insurance agents and financial planners to join their forces and sell a combination of policies and advice to anxious parents: “Astounding results!” “A gold mine!” “Today’s hottest market!””
““There are good college planners out there, but also too many who think the solution to every family’s college funding problem is to buy an annuity or life insurance policy,” says Lynn O’Shaughnessy, author of The College Solution. “They are snake-oil salesmen, and no one is policing them.””
“Many advisers follow a formula, she says: “They buy a list of names of families. They send out postcards offering free college funding seminars, they do the seminar, they scare the s— out of parents and then offer them hope.”
NACFA training videos obtained by MONEY seem to follow this approach. In them, session leaders suggest that advisers use questions and information to lead parents into what the late marketing guru David Sandler coined a “pain funnel” to increase their desire to pay for relief.”
“Although they’re often referred to as retirement plans, in fact these are nothing more than insurance policies, specifically variable universal life (VUL) and equity indexed universal life (EIUL).”
“a portion of your retirement savings is going to life insurance, and the cost of that coverage is often higher than what you would pay for a regular old term insurance policy.”
The investment fees are less explicit in EIUL policies, but they’re there nonetheless, built into the formulas that are used to calculate returns.
“Speaking of those formulas, they’re typically so complicated and convoluted, it’s difficult for any average person to follow them, let alone understand whether or not you’re getting a good deal.”
“I think these policies are too expensive, too complicated and too much trouble to be worthwhile.”
(Wall Street Journal – Nov. 16, 2012)
“In the next few years, millions of savers are in for a surprise that could cost them tens of thousands of dollars now—or hundreds of thousands later.
The reason: Universal-life insurance policies bought years ago when interest rates were high will face cancellation if policyholders don’t pay more.”
“If interest rates stay low, many policyholders will face the unhappy choice of kicking in more money, accepting a lower death benefit or walking away, possibly sacrificing years of premiums they already paid.
Many people are “sitting on a ticking time bomb,” says Kenneth Himmler, president of Integrated Asset Management, an advisory firm in Los Angeles. About 70% of the new clients whose insurance coverage he reviews are facing higher out-of-pocket costs because policies aren’t generating enough interest income to pay costs, he says.”
“An important caveat: “surrender charges,” which are fees levied when you cancel a policy, typically last from 10 to 20 years from the start of the policy, and sometimes are more than the first year’s premium. They can eat up a big chunk of savings if you try to try to cancel a policy or even lower the death benefit.”
“”Many of these policies are lying in drawers and lockboxes, and people don’t even know there is a problem” because they didn’t fully understand how the contracts worked, said Loren Coppock, chairman of insurance and financial strategies firm TrueNorth Cos. in Cedar Rapids. “Most of these policies will expire worthless unless big steps are taken now.””
“Variable universal life can benefit investors in the highest tax bracket who already have socked away the maximum allowable amounts in tax-deferred retirement accounts and similar savings vehicles.”
“Yet the products aren’t appropriate for many middle-class households, and even well-to-do consumers should be wary, according to experts and state regulators.
Insurance agents and brokers can collect rich commissions for selling variable universal life and indexed universal life, which means they can have a powerful incentive to promote the products.
Furthermore, the marketing materials can feature rosy projections of potential gains.”
“Many policyholders were counting on stronger gains to help cover the annual charges in their later years and some have been stunned by meager interest payments that have left them short of what they need. As a result, many face a dilemma: Pay more into the policies, cut the death benefit to reduce the annual charges, or drop coverage, experts say.”
“But many consumers don’t understand indexed universal-life policies, regulators say. Iowa Insurance Commissioner Nick Gerhart says he has “several complaints on my desk, as we speak.”
Customers aren’t the only ones who struggle to get it. “We’ve had situations where the agents don’t understand the product,” he says.”
“Back in the 1990s, agents started pitching college savers on “variable universal life insurance,” a type of “permanent” insurance that is designed to be in force for the insured person’s lifetime.”
“The problem is that variable universal life is also a “particularly complex and difficult” type of life insurance that typically carries higher costs than other types, says Peter Katt, a fee-only life-insurance adviser in Kalamazoo, Mich.
The biggest flaw, advisers say, is the way the policies are sold. State insurance officials and the Securities and Exchange Commission allow sales representatives to show projections of possible earnings in the savings account as high as 12% a year—a rate of return that virtually no financial planner would consider realistic.
High hypothetical projections “are seducing people with the false expectation of what their potential return on investment could be,” Mr. Kantrowitz says. “If someone tells you that you can get a huge return on investment, some people might believe it. People don’t enter into financial decisions with a high degree of suspicion.””
“Their two policies had values of $48,180 and $48,129, respectively, as of their most recent statements—but according to the original 12% projections, the policies should have roughly $120,000 each, a total gap of about $144,000 between the two policies. The other children’s policies also have shortfalls, the family contends.”
“if the clients, now age 65, don’t pay any more premiums, the policy could expire worthless when the clients reach age 78.”
Retirement Disaster Looms For Universal Life Policyholders
(Forbes – Sept. 13, 2012)
“The insurance industry has a dirty little secret that threatens the retirement plans of millions of unsuspecting families.”
“Hidden in those policies was this potential time bomb: if the projected investment returns fail to materialize, the insurance company can make up the difference by reducing the cash value—taking money out of your cash value savings account—right down to zero, if necessary. And when that’s exhausted, they can require the policyholder to make up the difference in the death benefit premiums, or risk the policy expiring worthless.”
“Universal life policyholders who faithfully paid all the minimum premium payments all those years are discovering that the cash values that were to be their retirement nest eggs are nearly exhausted, and many are having to cough up huge payments just to keep the death benefit from lapsing.”
“Most policyholders don’t realize they have a problem, until one day they need the cash value or discover that they will be left without even the life insurance.”
Life Insurance: Avoid Universal and Variable Policies – Why term policies are the best option
(US News – Nov. 1, 2011)
“A much better strategy is buying term life insurance and using the money you’d otherwise spend on variable life insurance to invest on your own. That way your life insurance costs will be much lower. And over time, you’ll be positioned to increase value in your own investment account, compared with a bundle of insurance and investments in a universal or variable policy. The reason: You won’t be paying extra fees that ultimately eat into your personal investment returns.”
Universal Life: The Inconvenient Truth about the “Other” Permanent Insurance
(Partners4Prosperity – Feb. 14, 2014)
“Attempting to be a hybrid between Wall Street’s promise of gains and the insurance world’s actuarial tables and slow but solid profits, UL has done neither well. But it succeeded in spades in the marketing department, giving consumers what they wanted. (At least, at first….)”
“Fueled by low interest rates, market losses, fine print that protects the companies over policyholders, and premiums that don’t cover actual costs, countless Universal Life policies are imploding or threatening to do so soon.”
“Account Value is NOT the same as Cash Value Heads up, quite a lot of folks miss out on the nuances of this one. You see it’s like this. If you take the time to look at your last statement , you will find three different values reported. One of these is your stated account value, another is the cash value and the third is the surrender value. Now pay attention here, this is where the details get a bit hairy.
You see, if you ever read the fine print on your cash value life insurance policy you will discover something called surrender charges built in. You can find out how much this number is by comparing your account value and cash value on your statements. In other words, the difference between the two numbers is the surrender charge. You can think of this as the penalty or fee you pay for canceling the policy.
Insider’s Secret Guess what? The amount mentioned above, the surrender charge is the preferred manner in which insurance companies bury the sales commission. So obviously, if your insurance carrier charges a lower sales commission, the surrender charge will be lower. At the same time, the lower surrender charge means the surrender cash value is higher. See how that works?”
“NASD, a securities industry regulator, and the New York State Insurance Department are investigating the sale of variable annuities by Prudential Financial Services, one of the nation’s largest insurance companies.
The agencies are looking into possible forgeries and other improper handling of sales documents; whether the performance of variable annuities, a combination of insurance and mutual funds, was misrepresented; and whether the investments were suitable for the customers who put their money in them, people who have been briefed on the situation said yesterday.”
“Over the last few years, much of the business in variable annuities has involved exchanging an old one for a new one. Many companies have been offering bonuses to customers to make an exchange, but the bonuses often amount to advances of money that the investor eventually pays back to the insurance company through higher fees.”
“The fact is, a variable life insurance policy may not capture the success of its underlying investment fund. In other words, the fund behind the product may be a spectacular success and the policy owner may get none of it.
Tell this to the people who sell variable life and they just get angry. Yet, in this litigious society, they are likely targets of the next sales practices investigations.”
“Insurance companies profit handsomely from folks who unwittingly buy into cash value plans and then drop them early. Agents make more in commissions when they sell these plans than they do from term life sales. These are not necessarily indictments of the industry, as cash value plans provide a valuable consumer service under certain scenarios. But they are reasons to be a very careful shopper when it comes to cash value insurance.
One common sales tactic is to stress that cash value policies are “permanent” and that a payoff is “guaranteed,” as opposed to those “temporary” policies in which your money simply “disappears.” Term life can be as “permanent” as you choose to make it, via guaranteed renewable policies. And equivalent amounts of money “disappear,” to pay for insurance, whether the policy is term or cash value. There can be benefits to a cash value plan, but these are not among them.”
“There are several ways for agents to cheat. In some cases they fail to pass along premiums to insurers. In others, they pilfer funds from the cash value of a policy or surrender a policy and keep the proceeds.
“Premium scams are a constant and widespread problem that likely will grow worse in this nightmarish economy,” says James Quiggle of the Coalition Against Insurance Fraud. “Most [agents] are honest, but bilking vulnerable clients can mean easy money some just can’t pass up.”
“In the 21st year of the policy, the premium was supposed to be almost 100 times the first year’s premium, and it was only going to rise further, since term insurance gets more expensive as people age. This [70-year old] man closed the policy down, which meant he no longer would receive the death benefit, and even the pitiful gains his investment had realized were now taxable because he’d lost the umbrella of the insurance policy tax structure.”
“These dogs with fleas are generally sold to those with high incomes, such as doctors, as a way to put loads of money away in a tax-free environment instead of the limitations of an individual retirement account or 401(k). The illustrations are not realistic and fail to speak plain English as to what is going to happen with these policies.”
“They will be worse off because they do not earn enough for their pension contributions to outweigh the charges imposed by the life insurance companies operating their pension plans.”
“It is hard to avoid the conclusion that the real beneficiaries of the move to create an alternative to Serps have been the life insurers rather than the people whose interests they are supposed to be serving.”
“As early as 1991, a survey conducted by the SIB showed that between a quarter and a third of savers were terminating life assurance and pension policies within two years of starting them, even though the products were designed to run for 10, 15 or 25 years. Terminations after just one year ranged from nearly 14 per cent for with-profits life products to 22.3 per cent for unit-linked products (including endowment policies and savings plans) in 1990. Terminations over the first and second years rose to 23 per cent and 37 per cent respectively.
The picture for pensions was broadly similar, with nearly 30 per cent of with-profits and more than 36 per cent of unit- linked pensions terminated within two years of being taken out.”
“In January, it announced that those who sold life assurance products would have to disclose their commission on the sale after January 1995; they would be given the option of doing so from July 1994. The SIB also required that investors be given more information about surrender values on policies and that illustrations of a product’s performance should reflect the company’s own charges.”
“But there are plenty of people who believe that the SIB has skirted the fundamental issue. ‘The commission-driven system is at the heart of the problem,’ Ms Eaglesham says. She points out that it pits the interests of the client against those of the salesman.”
“With commission of 3-4 per cent on single-premium products and as much as 50 per cent on regular-premium products in their first few years of operation, the salesman has a vested interest in pushing regular premiums. And most customers are unaware that the bulk of the payments in the first few years are consumed by hefty up-front commissions.
‘The difficulty is, we have let customers believe such services are ‘free’,’ one industry insider argues. He believes that the provision of financial services on a fee-paying basis would result in a more ethical industry, and frankly admits that buyers must beware.”
“But the question remains, who is responsible for the mess? ‘It’s wrong to say that the problem comes down to an unscrupulous sales force. It’s the companies that encouraged them, the people who were employing them, that are to blame,’ Mr Denham argues. He believes the finger should be pointed at senior management.
In fact, several of the industry’s top figures have attracted criticism for their partin promoting the wonderful world of personal pensions. Sir Mark Weinberg, former head of Allied Dunbar, and Marshall Field, former general manager of Phoenix Assurance, were among the ‘retirement’ study group appointed to advise the Government. In other words, the industry was deeply involved in drafting the system of self-regulation under which it still operates.
Insult was added to injury recently when Joe Palmer was appointed to run the Personal Investment Authority, the newest regulatory body. Mr Palmer presided over Legal & General when it failed to comply with rules for which it was later fined pounds 180,000 by Lautro.
The evidence already suggests that ‘the industry cannot police itself’, Ms Eaglesham says. ‘It has a clear conflict of interest between the rule to give best advice and the profits it is generating from the sale of these products.’ But if the industry and its regulatory mechanisms are at fault, so too is the Government. Its ‘enthusiasm for private pensions, unfettered by common sense or a sense of responsibility, has led to a situation where the interest of the consumer has taken second place to the interests of those selling personal pensions’, Mr Denham says.
‘From the initial decision to encourage opting out of Serps, the Government actively promoted the move to personal pension plans,’ he argues. ‘The Government was responsible for a whole broadside of publicity, without any discrimination, in an industry that had no effective regulation.'”
“What concerns me a great deal is the number of people who are going to be living in poverty in 10 years’ time because they have bought an annuity. Or the number of widows forced into poverty because their husband had bought a single life annuity.”
FCA inquiry into ‘zombie funds’ hits industry but may help millions of savers
(The Guardian – March 28, 2014)
” The centrepiece of the FCA inquiry is likely to be millions of pension and investment policies sold in the 1980s and 1990s, in which savers are allegedly trapped by penalty charges of 10%-12% and, in some cases, more than 20% if they want to move their money. Many were sold by salespeople who earned commission of £1,500 to £2,000 a policy, with the first two years of contributions by savers sometimes taken out as charges, followed by annual charges of as much as 4% a year.”
” Patrick Connolly, a certified financial planner at Chase de Vere, said the inquiry was “not before time”, as many people were locked into inflexible products with “extortionate” exit penalties.
“While times have moved on and those taking out pensions more recently should have benefited from much lower charges, insurance companies have been reluctant to address their older contracts and offer a fair deal to policyholders,” he said.”
“The investments in question include personal pensions, endowment policies and “whole of life” insurance policies, and are all in funds that are now closed. The pensions under the spotlight are personal funds, set up by individuals, rather than workplace schemes.”
“City watchdogs are announcing a probe into a vast mis-selling scandal by the life insurance industry.
The Financial Conduct Authority is to investigate the selling of 30 million financial policies worth £150billion between the 1970s and 2000.”
“The FCA said the investigation into insurance policies will start in the summer amid claims customers who took out private pensions, endowments, investment bonds and life insurance were subject to rip-off fees and sub-standard service.”
“Ros Altmann says: “For the bottom 5 or so companies you have to live till nearly a hundred before they’re paying you anything other than your own money… Having done the figures and worked through this research it seems to me that the mis-selling of annuities could be at least as big as the mis-selling of payment protection insurance.””
“The Pensions Minister Steve Webb has accused insurance companies of making “excess profits” from savers when they come to retirement.”
” An increasing number of people have been complaining about the apparent mis-selling of “whole-of-life” insurance policies.
These are policies which promise to pay out a supposedly fixed sum to the policy holder’s inheritors when the customer eventually dies, with the payment coming from the investment proceeds of the person’s monthly premiums.
Some people have been aggrieved to find that many years down the line, the bank or insurer that originally sold them their policy has decided that things have changed.
Either the customer must pay more by way of monthly premiums or must accept that the eventual payout will be significantly lower than first thought.
The typical explanation is that investment returns have been much poorer than first anticipated many years ago, when the policies were first sold.”
“Hundreds of thousands of people relying on investment-linked pensions for their retirement income are facing the terrifying possibility that their payments might dry up.
These are pension savers who were encouraged to use their pension pots to buy “with-profits annuities” – policies where their future income would be linked to the investment performance of opaque and complex with-profits funds.”
“The seeds of today’s problems date back to the invention of unit-linked policies in the 1960s, says Tony Bridgland in the last of his three-part series on the history of with-profits insurance”
Insurance mis-selling prompts 400 complaints an hour in U.K.
(The Globe and Mail – Oct. 23, 2012)
“Britain’s Financial Ombudsman Service is getting up to 400 complaints an hour from consumers who believe they were sold unwanted insurance products, pointing to a further rise in the compensation bill for banks.”
“The Financial Conduct Authority has finally confirmed that it is looking into whether 30 million pension, endowment, investment bond and life insurance customers were ‘exploited’ and mis-sold products.
The regulator will determine whether policies, sold by doorstep salesmen between the 1970s and 2000, were mis-sold or moved onto platforms that benefited the firm but not the customer.”
“Fraudulent life insurance is being sold with impunity, often using IRDA’s name. Intermediaries have neither been penalised nor have they lost their license. There is a need for stern action from IRDA and insurers to curb the menace. Will the regulator act?
Moneylife Foundation Insurance Helpline has been receiving increased number of complaints regarding fraudulent calls to sell insurance policy. The modus operandi has been to fool a gullible person by playing with their greed. The offers can range from bonus offer by Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA), interest-free loan from Reliance Capital, Airtel mobile tower rent, call to surrender ULIP without loss, investing ininitial public offerings (IPOs) of life insurance companies at attractive price, sharing of agent contest offer to sharing of commission given in form of gold, etc. The callers try to build trust by giving personal details of policyholders’ and their policies. Is your personal data freely available?
There are talks about such information being sold on CD/DVD in locations around Delhi. Imagine, a shady character getting hold of such data of different insurance companies and mis-using it to wreck you financially. Often, the trap is about making good of earlier bad investment by buying another insurance policy. The end result is that the customer is stuck with multiple policies from different insurance companies. Unfortunately, these products are regular premium policies with no option of single premium and hence, the customer is made to choose between a difficult decision to give up the one premium paid or to continue the premium payment each year for a crappy product.”
“In a conversation with this reporter, an official from the Ministry of Finance, who did not wish to be identified, admitted that rampant misselling in the life insurance industry has been a matter of concern for the ministry for some time now. “Misselling has always been on our agenda and the kind of money that investors have lost is worrisome. I think it is deliberate on the part of the insurers to not publish how much the investors have lost but we will now take it up with the insurers,” he said. That insurance policies have been missold in the past years is a known fact. But this murky reality has always existed without a crucial link—the impact of misselling could never be quantified. For an industry that has been privatised for now 12 years and is still fighting the ills of misselling, it is unfortunate that it still does not publish the losses faced by investors. However, Mint in its research has estimated a loss of Rs.1.5 trillion to the investors from FY05 to FY12.”
“”The insurance regulator is extremely weak in penalizing the industry. Owing to a weak regulator and the legal system there is a sense in the industry that they can get away. It should not be so,” says Bejon Mishra, Consumer Online Foundation, an organisation that works in the field of consumer protection. The incentive structure has also encouraged misselling. “Investors don’t lose out because of insurance products, they lose out because of misselling. And this can be checked only if you incentivize the agent to sell for the long term. With front-loaded commissions what incentive are you giving an agent to service an insurance policy for the long term or even sell the policy for the long term?” asks Deepak M. Satwalekar, former managing director and CEO, HDFC Standard Life Insurance Co. Ltd.”
“the complaint mechanism needs to be strengthened. “There is already a consumer rederessal cell within Irda. That should be strengthened and wherever misselling can be proved, class action suits should be taken,” says Satwalekar. And it’s already happening in developed countries. The Financial Services Authority (FSA), regulator of financial services industry in the UK, has ordered major banks in the UK to compensate customers who have been missold financial products. This compensation goes into billions of pounds.”
“Mis-selling of insurance policies, it seems, is rampant even today. At least that is what the persistency rates — which reveal what percentage of customers continued to pay the premium after the initial years — of insurance companies say.
According to a recent research report from brokerage firm Espirito Santo, between 20 per cent and 35 per cent of the policies across life insurers lapse in the second year itself. Simply put, it means that many policyholders are abandoning their insurance policies mid-way.”
“Insurance agents switched to pushing traditional endowment plans after the tightening of guidelines for Unit-linked Insurance Plans, or Ulips, in September 2010. The age-old practice of selling these insurance products as insurance-cum-tax-saving-cum-secure-investment pitch would have got many gullible investors. “Many are talked into buying policies that only choke up their cash-flows without furthering their goals. They may be earning around Rs 15-17 lakh per annum, but if their cash-flow is limited to say, Rs 4-5 lakh and bulk of it is directed towards annual premiums, then there will be problems. This leaves them with little surplus to invest in other productive avenues to meet their goals,” says Suresh Sadagopan, certified financial planner, Ladder7 Financial Advisories.”
“The practice of mis-selling is so common in India that even Finance Minister P Chidambaram is troubled. While talking to reporters earlier this year, he pinned mis-selling as “the reason why insurance is stumbling in India.”
Business has been booming for the insurance sector ever since it was privatized in 2000. But it has not been a smooth run, and it certainly has not been kind to investors. A recent study by a national newspaper revealed that investors lost more than Rs. 1.56 trillion over the span of a seven-year period that ended in 2011-12.
Insurance is supposed to protect, not trap investors. Yet, agents and insurers are known to be unscrupulous. Mis-selling is something most insurance buyers have experienced at some point. So what is it that makes insurance in India so susceptible to mis-selling?
1. Birth of Investment-cum-insurance Products
The unit-linked insurance plan (ULIP) was born in India in 2002. Reports of mis-selling are invariably connected with this product…
2. Agents’ Eagerness to Earn High Commissions
Unit-linked policies are known to pay higher commissions, which is why in the post-2002 period agents began to sell such plans at the cost of traditional ones. Moreover, now that more players had entered the insurance markets, agents no longer needed to maintain long-term ties with a single insurer—they could jump from company to company too.”
“What the government needs to know is no amount of discussion will achieve anything unless IRDA is made accountable for approving harmful products, mis-selling is clearly defined, there are exemplary punishment for those found selling wrong policies to bank customers.”
Life insurance is being sold fraudulently with a corporate approach to defraud gullible people. Intermediaries have neither been penalised nor have they lost their license. There is a need for stern action from IRDA and insurers to curb the menace. Will the regulator act?
Mis-selling of life insurance is ubiquitous. It can be about giving wrong information about product features or exaggerated returns. The new trend is fraudulent selling of policies with offers that may just lure the greedy and the gullible by offers of “interest-free” loan, mobile tower rent, helping to get company bonus, surrender of a policy without loss, etc. If you happen to lower your guard, you may a royal run around after getting stuck with a policy of trivial value. We have written several stories detailing this fraud.
Moneylife spoke with senior officials from an insurance company to piece together this disturbing trend. The fingers point to a few brokers and corporate agents. They work with multiple distance marketing agencies who in-turn log the sales. The arrangement is convenient as the brokers and corporate agents can feign ignorance of the fraudulent selling due to business agreements with multiple agencies. Even if their own employee is involved, they can terminate the employment after passing the blame solely to them. It is unfortunate that insurance brokers who are supposed to represent clients by offering the best products for their needs are taking consumers to cleaners and that too without even meeting them in many cases. The insurance companywe spoke distanced itself from few brokers to avoid suspicious policies being sold.”
“The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said complaints of mis-selling insurance products could impact the continuation of policies, affecting the cash flows of companies. In its Financial Stability Report, RBI said such complaints have been rising in recent years.
In 2012-13, there were 341,012 registered life insurance complaints as compared to 309,613 for 2011-12.”
“Mis-selling broadly means unfair or fraudulent practices in soliciting or selling policies not sought by a customer. Or, where customers feel the policy sold is different from what they wanted or were promised.
RBI said the increasing number of complaints could affect the public’s confidence in insurance products, intermediaries and insurance companies.”
“Yet, poor persistency has been a bane in India. A rough calculation of simple averages shows that in the previous three years, the industry reported an average 13th month persistency rate of less than 65%—this means that lesser than 65% policies were renewed for the second year.”
“Allowing insurers to set their own persistency threshold holds the risk of the industry slipping back instead of improving on its sales practices. “Mis-selling is a big concern. Poor persistency is often the outcome of mis-selling. That’s why it is useful to set a high benchmark across the industry.
There must be a rationale behind why the regulator has removed the uniform persistency requirement,” says Mehta. And it’s not the rationale alone that needs to be elaborated upon.
The other thing that has to be made available in the public domain is data on the persistency performance of life insurance agents—how many agents made the cut in the past three years, and how many didn’t.”
“Misselling has been the backbone of selling financial products.”
“Caller– Sir, I have called you for a wonderful savings product from an insurance company. Can I take your two minutes.
Me– Yes (I was keen to hear the “wonderful“ )
Caller– Sir, we have a very good savings plan which guarantees you 13% return in three year’s time.”
“”There are maximum cases in which insurance customers have complained that they had been sold policies by saying that it was single premium ‘Fixed Deposit’ scheme with high returns.
“But to their utter shock, customers found from the policy (document) that they would now have to pay premium for several years, rather than paying once. Such kind of cases fall in the category of mis-selling,” official said.
It also came to notice through complaints that customers were deliberately being denied of the ‘free look’ period option by unscrupulous agents so that customers were left with no other option than continuing with the policy.”
“Do you know that, on account of mis-selling, investors lost about Rs.1.5 Trillion (USD 28 billion) over 2004-05 to 2011-12?
Above mentioned estimates are according to paper published by Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research (IGIDR), Mumbai (http://www.igidr.ac.in /pdf/publication /WP-2013-007.pdf).
Do you know that if you bought your insurance policy from agent, there is more than 85% chance that you have been mis-sold?”
“I get a number of mails from readers who have been tricked by authorised insurance agents into buying policies that are in no way meant for them. There are also complaints of agents making all kinds of false promises and enticing consumers into buying policies. Such practices are highly condemnable, besides the fact that they violate several regulations drawn up by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority. They also constitute unfair trade practice under the Consumer Protection Act. Yet, such violations continue and the worst part is that insurers often say that they cannot take responsibility for the actions of their agents.”
“The life insurance industry continues to face the menace of mis-selling. Even the finance minister publicly admonished insurers on the practice.”
“Training of agents has not brought any qualitative improvement in the agency, [i.e., commissions corrupt everyone, regardless of their level of education].”
“As per reports, companies thrive on lapses. For example, HDFC Life reported profits of 88.3% due to lapsed policies. This figure for Kotak Life is 80%. The higher the average premium, the greater the lapses. The link is proved by the fact that the average premium of HDFC Life is 54,473, while for Kotak Life, it is 73,762.”
“The bancassurance channel has been added to the already crowded list of sources of mis-selling. The free-look period expires due to manipulation in delivery of policy with the result that the clients feel cheated.”
“The incentives of foreign jaunts and expensive gifts must stop immediately as it proves to be big source of mis-s-selling;”
“When an agent sells a life insurance product in making payment of R1 lakh premium, he gets R40,000 and a mere R100 for pension fund product. Obviously, this is temptation to force-sell life insurance, which unfortunately has driven to malpractice of rebating.”
“With Ulip in focus, agents cluck-cluck about it and push endowments, which offer bigger commissions!”
“Chirag and Naina Joshi, who live in the Mumbai suburb of Malad, were recently visited by the neighbourhood insurance agent.”
“The agent convinced them that their investments in unit linked insurance plans (Ulips) might get into trouble in the days to come. And so it was best to redeem that investment and put that money into endowment insurance plans.
Worried at all the negative coverage against Ulips in the media, the couple decided to get out of their Ulip investment and put the Rs 5 lakh that they get into an endowment policy.
“There are insurance agents who are approaching clients and showing all the campaign against Ulips and getting them to buy endowment policies,” says Uday Kulkarni, an author, who brought this trend to the attention of DNA.
“These agents are getting policyholders out of Ulips sold to them by other agents and getting them to invest in endowment policies,” he adds.”
“Four out of five life insurance agents that DNA contacted tried to sell endowment products when the reporters told them they already had Ulip policies.”
“Over and above this, endowment policies are not transparent at all.
“Traditionally,” says Shanbhag, “these policies have been quite opaque. Neither has the insurance company been declaring where and how the premium collected has been invested; nor has the investor been asking for any transparency in the matter.”
Agrees Sadagopan “Nothing is disclosed — not the charges, nor where they are going to deploy the funds. Ulips are far better in this regard.”
Since these charges are hidden, people think there are no charges at all in such policies, something the insurance agents make use of.”
“The Indian insurance industry is suffering a lot due to mis-selling of insurance products. Due to short term gain some scrupulous advisers, Brokers, lead generating agencies, websites are mis-selling life insurance policies with a bang.”
“I am writing on behalf of my father who has been GROSSELY CHEATED FOR A MASSIVE AMOUNT TOTALLING NEARLY 12LACS for Multiple life insurance Policies (by BIRLA SUNLIFE & RELIANCE) by 3 different Insurance Broker Agencies”
“The reason why insurance is stumbling in India is because of mis-selling of products and complex products.”
~ P Chidambaram, Finance Minister+
“Getting calls from insurance companies/agents is a common feature these days. No matter how hard you try, it’s almost impossible to avoid such unsolicited insurance marketing calls. However, you can, rather should, definitely avoid being cheated by the insurance mis-sellers. We are sharing a real life case study to make you aware of their modus operandi.”
It was a trap to target uninformed investors by confidently highlighting features of the plan which don’t actually exist. By the time the investor will realize that he/she has been mis-sold the policy, it will be too late.
The caller provides very lucrative investment offer verbally using ‘according to IRDA guidelines’ multiple times in the conversation to generate trust amongst the prospects. Then a special limited-time offeris provided to hit upon the prospects psychologically by statements like ‘sir, this offer is available for today only. Where should I send our representative?’”
“Beware of insurance agents and the tricks they use to mis-sell policies that benefit only them.
A scary looking man grins at the camera, benignly shaking his head with utmost sincerity. An animated devil like creature, although way less scary than his grinning human counterpart, disappears with a poof behind the grinning face. One of the prominent insurance companies in the country flashes its logo with an attractive jingle and some tagline about honesty.
Once I get past my mortification at the aesthetics (or lack of it) of this advertisement, I realise that this ad may well have been an unintended satire on the perceived ugliness (literal and figurative) of all the insurance agents in the country combined. The underlying message is well meaning — that the agents of ‘X’ company are honest. But, the ad is also representative of a very disturbing reality of the insurance industry — the unruffled acceptance of dishonest, mis-selling tactics. So much so that a particular company deemed it fit to project the absence of these tactics as its USP.
I may not have gone so far. Every week, hundreds of mis-selling and dishonest insurance agents-related complaints land on our desks at Akosha. The sheer number and magnitude of these complaints in itself is a proof of the extent to which this racket is flourishing in the country.
IRDA or the insurance regulator has been constantly trying to curb these practices with all sorts of measures and regulations and is all set to come up with revised guidelines for life insurance industry. The efforts have met with reasonable success. And yet, an industry that thrives on innovation in ways to cheat continues to do what it does the best — cheat.”
“These products [traditional life policies] are also opaque on the many fees and charges imposed by insurance companies.”
“Driven by high commissions, the insurers created large tied agency sales forces and other distribution tie-ups which lead to these [unit-linked] products out-competing mutual funds in the retail and high net worth segments. Given the high acquisition costs, the returns offered by [unit-linked policies], at least in the first five years, were highly impaired.
This triggered a turf war between the market regulator (Sebi) and insurance regulator (Irda) and culminated in regulatory changes in the product design and on commission rates for insurance products.”
“In our experience [at Waterfield Advisers], we have encountered almost all of our clients having been mis-sold unit linked and other insurance plans.”
“We have found that many of our clients are underinsured and need to buy more cover.”
“Insurance companies have sought relaxation in the hefty penalties proposed in the insurance bill for ‘mis-selling’ and demanded that they should not be held liable for any ‘act of omission’ by their agents. In a representation to the select committee of Rajya Sabha, which is examining the bill, insurers have argued that an “exorbitant increase” in penalties will not only discourage regulated entities but also affect voluntary compliance.”
“So you get a call amidst your decision from someone hawking universal life insurance. Should you buy in? All prudent financial advisers unanimously say no.”
“Avoid Universal Life Insurance At All Costs”
“Whereas premiums in a typical term policy are about a third of a percent (1/3 of 1% = .33%) of the death benefit, in universal life they are 1% or more. Over many decades that can be costly.”
“The management expenses are always higher than a non-registered identical investment outside a universal life policy. This is odd because there are no extra management requirements, or active management in either index segregated funds. They are all clones of other investments. As one observer put it they charge custom prices for an off the shelf product. Would you pay prime rib prices for a single patty fast food hamburger?”
“Policy owners will build up their investment accounts over a period of time. However, did you know that in the first 10-15 years of a universal life policy if they wish to access their own money in that account they must pay a fee called the surrender charge. These fees can be up to or exceed the value of the account. For example: After 5 years an investment account is $8409. The surrender charge is $9450. Another example: After one year the investment account is worth $5244. The surrender charge is $12, 500. We all know life has speed bumps and hurdles along the way. These could include relationship breakdown, layoff, or sickness. How many of you know anyone who over a period of a decade and a half has not had an adverse financial event? How would it feel lose your money and on top of that pay up to double?”
“But the crucial question is: why buy an inferior investment that is very costly and that you cannot control? Why pay ocean front prices for a one room shack on a busy highway?”
“UL policies combine high fees and conservative investments leaving investor with nothing.”
“The high-school drop outs who sell universal life insurance will cry foul over RRSPs and the recent TFSA instruments. Fact is, educated financial advisers and market executives would never recommend UL for fear of being ridiculed by their peers.
To put into perspective, the advent of the Tax Free Savings Account (TFSA) should render universal life obsolete because its supposed tax benefits have been replaced by an investment vehicle with less restrictions and cost.”
“Universal Life is both the Canadian insurance industry’s biggest cash cow, and the most controversial.”
“More than one speaker warned UL could become the insurance industry’s next “vanishing premium” scandal.”
“The ambivalence about UL was evident in sessions entitled: Universal Life: Fiasco or Fantastic? and UL: A Dangerous Tool?”
“Problem is, high commissions and sky-high management expense ratios (MERs) on the underlying investments make the investment side of UL of dubious merit. And even the tax advantages were questioned”
“Porter says UL is so complex it’s not understood by 98% of the brokers and agents who sell it, let alone their clients”
“If you still INSIST on looking at UL here are crucial questions you must ask:
I understand that there is flexible and accelerated funding but if I make only the minimum payments over a period of time what happens?
Can I get money from my investment account at anytime?
How useful are the illustrated values in the early years if I can’t access them?
Is it a contradiction to fund a need for income security with variable investments and a variable rate of return?
Would the company lower the cost of insurance in the future?
What happens to the parts my policy if there is a bear market?
Whose property are the dividends from the linked investment?
Is there anytime I would have to pay tax on my rate of return?
Why would I give capital gains & dividend credits for a non registered investment inside universal life which may in future be taxed as income?
Why should I pay a higher management fees for the same investment I could get for less outside a universal life policy
Can you show me how the higher management fees would affect my investment return over 2-4 decades?
Are all expenses guaranteed and where is that stated in the policy?
Can you tell me the difference in commissions you would receive between term and UL?
“If this person had bought term insurance and invested the difference in premium from universal life insurance in a [Tax Free Savings Account] what would have happened in 2 or 3 decades?”
“Investing the $49 over 10 years at even 4% rate of return would give her $7,312 (9 times more than the investment in the universal life policy). After 20 years and 4% interest the TFSA would produce $18,140 (more than 10 times the universal life investment) and after 30 years she would have $34,122.”
“it’s just fine for a client to choose to purchase any investment they wish, based on full and truthful disclosure. However, it is fraudulent to imply that an inferior investment is actually superior, and thus cause the client to make an incorrect choice! This is what is wrong with selling UL policies as an investment, a “tax shelter”, a “Leveraged or Insured Retirement Plan”, or even as “term insurance with a savings plan”. It is simple to show that UL policies with certain types of extra fees cannot outperform a separate term policy + the identical investment. Their internal cost structures simply do not allow them to! To imply otherwise is to perpetrate a fraud. This particular word was very carefully chosen:”
“The impact of an excess annual compounding fee can be estimated by using the rule of 72; if the net after-bonus extra fee is 2%/year, then the client will have half the assets after 36 years, as compared to the identical investment in an open investment account! If the net after-bonus extra fee is 3%/year, then the client will have about half the money in 24 years!”
“MER on this policy’s S&P 500 index fund is 3.00% per year… you can obtain the identical investment outside of this UL policy for about 0.1% per year. (Yes, you read that right”
“Now, the whole-life insurance agent is going to say “but, I’m not licensed to sell them an ETF!” and they’re right. However, since when did it become an excuse not to not DISCLOSE a client’s options, just because you aren’t licensed? Doesn’t one decide first what the right thing is to do, and then obtain the appropriate licensing to do that? If you have decided, as a professional, that “I believe stock market indexes are my client’s best option.”, then wouldn’t you get the licenses that allow you to give your clients those indexes without ruining them financially?”
“What client would knowing have “goals and objectives” involving knowingly losing half of their assets in 24 years, or having one quarter of the money they could have had (in the identical investment, remember) at retirement in 48 years? That seems like financial suicide to me…”
“Obviously, no client would knowing opt for such a product if it was fully disclosed, would they? So, why isn’t the Alberta Insurance Council, which purports to extol the virtues of “full disclosure”, not interested in forcing the thousands of agents who propose this product using policy projections to practice full disclosure? In fact, the policy projection sheets used to illustrate the product show the exact opposite of the math within the policy document; that the investment portion of this UL product, with its extra fees, will actually outperform the same investment outside the UL account!! How is that possible? Supposedly, by returning you a small portion of the extra fees in the form of a bonus!?!”
“All you have to do is misrepresent these vital facts, and voila!, you’ve sold a lovely high-commission Universal Life program; and the best thing about it, the client won’t know he’s been shafted for several decades (if ever!); certainly, only long after you’ve retired to Arizona.”
“Simply put, proposals involving UL “wash loans” to fund retirement income are the most treacherous, damaging, insulting fraud being perpetrated on the Canadian population today. The combined financial damage of tens of thousands of these contracts on the retirement income generating capacity of this nation’s aging population, so far as I have been able to determine, dwarfs any other fraud in living memory, in scope, hubris, and sheer intellectual malignancy. With combined losses measuring in the tens or even hundreds of billions of dollars of lost capital and income, it is destined to be the life insurance industry’s Waterloo.”
Any way you slice it, UL is brutal for the owner, and awesome for the salesman — it will generate a far greater commission than selling the straight term insurance with a separate investment. It is great to sell to anyone not interested in figuring out the math, by any salesman not interested in whether or not his/her clients are being shafted. The proofs against it are independent of rate-of-return assumptions, are are easily grasped by even mathematically disinclined clients and agents. Therefore, there is no excuse for the apparent lack of action against these abuses by the regulatory agencies responsible for protecting the interests of life insurance clients.
Worst yet, there are droves of young agents being misled into selling these contracts to their friends and family, by whole-life insurance agency owners slavering over the fat overrides and agency commissions generated by all these Universal Life insurance sales within their agency. Do you reallythink that most new, young agents understand these facts about how UL works? Not likely. Do you think that an agency owner understands them? Of course — they are not stupid! They can do the same basic arithmetic that I can!”
“Customers of insurance and investment advisers are being sold expensive products not knowing that hidden incentives have distorted the advice they receive.
The undisclosed deals often take the form of extra commissions for reaching volume sales targets, and luxury overseas holidays are offered to advisers with the best sales.
The incentives are so generous that commissions in New Zealand are among the highest in the developed world, adding as much as 30% to the cost of some insurance products.”
“Insurers run league tables for the competitions so advisers know where they are in the rankings, and how many policies they need to sell to win a trip.”
“Detractors say advisers shouldn’t liken themselves to salespeople and soft commissions tarnish the image of the industry and undermine the quality of advice.
Allan Morris, a director of insurance adviser Triplejump, said: “To avoid conflict of interest, soft commissions, performance (volume, profitability) bonuses/over-riders should be ruled out, overseas and domestic holidays should be ruled out. Equally, paying for in-house training and in-house systems development should be ruled out.”
“Currently, weak consumer protection laws mean financial intermediaries are required to disclose fees and commissions only when asked, and only then on certain types of products, and there’s no policing of what they are telling clients.”
“There’s a huge conflict of interest. Advisers have to choose whether they give advice that’s in the best interests of their clients or which pays them commission, and they choose commission every time.”
“Whitely said the only way to turn what was in effect a sales channel for product producers into an independent professional advice channel was to change the law to require financial intermediaries to act in the best interests of their client.
Overnight, commission as a form of remuneration would disappear, he said, though he admitted the Australian government was not a supporter of such a move.”
“Fee-based financial planner Robert Oddy fears intensive lobbying by powerful industry groups could result in a watering down of tough disclosure proposals which would require volume agreements, hidden margins and soft-dollar commissions to be fully disclosed, as well as advisers of all kinds setting out in dollar terms the impact on returns of their commissions and fees. Advisers would have to provide “health warnings” on the limitations of the advice they gave.”
“In order to accommodate various opinions from academia and businesses with regards to possible measures to reduce the mis-selling of insurance products, the Financial Supervisory Service (“FSS”) held a seminar on January 21, 2014 in collaboration with the Korea Life Insurance Association and the General Insurance Association of Korea. Also, on April 10, 2014, the FSS announced its plans to enforce the resolution plan to reduce the mis-selling of insurance products based on the main points discussed at the seminar.”
“Yet one neglected financial sore still festers: the life-insurance industry.
Its troubles are every bit as big and dangerous as the more publicised woes of the banking system.”
“Japan’s life-insurance market dwarfs even America’s, making up more than 40% of worldwide premiums. One reason is that the Japanese are big savers who, until now, have had little choice of investments. But the insurers themselves give most of the credit to their unique sales force of “insurance ladies”. Recruited first from second world war widows, then housewives, insurance ladies had no training and were paid strictly on commission. Often they would sell policies to their families and friends and then quit. But more would join each year, and they spread locust-like through Japan. More than 90% of Japanese families now own a life-insurance policy.”
“Whole-life insurance is huge in Singapore; god knows why. It’s pitched as “investment PLUS savings PLUS protection!”, sure, and it plays on people’s fears of not being able to provide for their family.
But whole life insurance is almost always a disgraceful ripoff, compared to buying term and investing the difference.”
“By opting for whole-life instead of doing it himself, the guy is giving up $1.4 million in returns; if anything, he’s writing that cheque to the insurance company, because he’s letting them (mis-) manage his money.”
“And then there’s the punitive early-withdrawal fees. The massive sales charges. Every fee gouge you can imagine will be in there.
This is why people say “buy term and invest the difference”.”
“Fianna Fáil Finance spokesperson Michael McGrath has expressed concern over possible mis-selling of whole of life assurance. These are policies where customers purchase cover that provides a lump sum in the event of their death as well as purchasing units in an investment fund. The policies typically have a premium review clause after an initial 10 year period and then each subsequent 5 years up to age 70 and annually thereafter.
Deputy McGrath stated, “People have been shocked to find that, when the review takes place, the premium can, in some circumstances, be increased by 100% or more. In many instances, it is apparent that it was not made clear to customers at the time they first took out the policy that they could be subject to massive increases in the monthly cost. Customers are then faced with the dilemma of whether to pay the higher premium or cancel the policy and forego the benefit of the premia they have already paid. They may end up with inadequate or no life assurance coverage at all.””
“In a series of landmark decisions, the German Federal Court (BGH) held for the first time that unit-linked life assurance policies often qualify as investment products, and are therefore retroactively subject to much more stringent case law rules developed by German courts over recent years.
As a result, a large life insurer is likely to be liable for hundreds of millions of euros…in mis-selling charges”
“A new research suggests that millions of people could have fallen victim to mis-selling in the financial services industry. The conclusion was reached based on the findings by claims management company EMCAS that two-thirds of respondents surveyed in the UK are not aware that mis-selling of investment products is even possible.”
“Considering that a lot of investors in the UAE don’t have strong investment knowledge and often invest without proper professional advice, there is a strong likelihood that many consumers in this market have also been mis-sold to.”
“[An IFA] noted that there are no status requirements of the salesman stating whether the advice is from a single company, a restricted advice company, or from the entire market place. “All these things and more have been mandatory in the UK for some 20 years. In the UAE, the principle of Caveat Emptor applies – buyer beware,” he adds.
Mis-selling is one of the most complained about by consumers. Between April and June this year alone, close to 160,000 new complaints were lodged at the Financial Ombudsman in the United Kingdom. A huge chunk of the consumer complaints were about mis-sold insurance.”
“So, what is the scenario here?
You are an expat, usually from the UK, working in Switzerland.
You receive a call at work or home by a plausible character offering a free financial consultation. You show up, and are sold a tax efficient offshore savings plan that offers tax free growth and is a life assurance plan to boot!
Usually there will be a seemingly high interest paying bond with a bank paying 10% or more!
Also, you do not pay the advisor any direct commission at all!
Sounds too good to be true? Well, you are correct, it is too good to be true.”
“these policies are heavily front loaded with the charges and can take up to 8 years to break even or even longer.
Indeed, the first two years of payments to the assurance company goes to pay the commission to the salesmen who sold you the policy in the first place.
So after two years you do not have a penny banked. Then your money flows into the funds, and starts to ‘grow’. However, the yearly admin charges are running at approx 5-6%, so even if your funds perform miracles and gets 8-9% return, your real return is 2 or 3%. This is why it takes so long to break even.”